A tight and somewhat fragile binding makes it difficult to collate this manuscript. A blank front flyleaf is integral to the textblock. One stub appears after f. 133.
Paper
The manuscript is in a relatively good condition, and the textblock very clean. The binding is slightly friable at its base.
Brown calf on paper boards, rather scuffed at both ends.
Blind tooling on front, back, and on spine. Additional gold tooling and lettering on spine, reading 'MISCELLEN'S'.
Typical mixed italic and secretary features. Mixture of backwards and italic 'e': see first line on f. 39r for example, 'thinke Jerusalem was neare taking', employing both letter forms. Italic 's' and 'h' do not descend below the baseline, as their earlier secretary forms would have done. Characteristics of this hand include the occasional ligature over 'ff' (see, for instance, f. 2r, f. 121v), and the long-backwards sloping ascender of minuscule 'd'. The very uniform appearance of this hand suggests that the compilation was finished in a relatively short period of time.
Our scribe liberally employs full stops and commas (the difference not always being very clear). Lines are occasionally filled out with tilde-like flourishes. At the end of a paragraph or an item final words are frequently centred. Spelling is idiosyncratic, but not unusually so for the period (for instance, frequent doubling of 'll' in 'generall', or 'Allexander'). Almost no abbbrevations, and few superscript letters (but occasionally 'ye').
The manuscript is unfoliated and unpaginated.
No ruling or pricking. Occasional catchwords added in the hand of the main scribe.
The scribe has left good-sized margins, so no text has been lost. Nevertheless, little space is wasted in this manuscript. The size of the hand and the length of the lines is very uniform throughout, giving an organised appearance. Items or sections of text are frequently divided by blank spaces or dotted horizontal lines.
There is no illustration or decoration anywhere in the manuscript; however, the top, front, and bottom edges of the paper (see Additional images) have been marbled in red and blue pattern. The vogue for marbled edges was apparently shortlived, between the 1670s and 1690s. Indeed, as David Pearson suggests (English Bookbinding Styles, 1450-1800), 'bindings with edges like this can normally be dated within that twenty-year window' (p. 112). This helps us confirm a date for the manuscript in the third (or final) quarter of the seventeenth century.
A Belton House bookplate can be found inside the front cover. No other marks of ownership. It is very likely that the manuscript never left Belton House after the collection was compiled by 'Old' Sir John Brownlowe.
By permission of the National Trust and Belton House.
Under the 'More' menu you can find metadata about the item, and information about sharing this image.
A tight and somewhat fragile binding makes it difficult to collate this manuscript. A blank front flyleaf is integral to the textblock. One stub appears after f. 133.
Paper
The manuscript is in a relatively good condition, and the textblock very clean. The binding is slightly friable at its base.
Brown calf on paper boards, rather scuffed at both ends.
Blind tooling on front, back, and on spine. Additional gold tooling and lettering on spine, reading 'MISCELLEN'S'.
Typical mixed italic and secretary features. Mixture of backwards and italic 'e': see first line on f. 39r for example, 'thinke Jerusalem was neare taking', employing both letter forms. Italic 's' and 'h' do not descend below the baseline, as their earlier secretary forms would have done. Characteristics of this hand include the occasional ligature over 'ff' (see, for instance, f. 2r, f. 121v), and the long-backwards sloping ascender of minuscule 'd'. The very uniform appearance of this hand suggests that the compilation was finished in a relatively short period of time.
Our scribe liberally employs full stops and commas (the difference not always being very clear). Lines are occasionally filled out with tilde-like flourishes. At the end of a paragraph or an item final words are frequently centred. Spelling is idiosyncratic, but not unusually so for the period (for instance, frequent doubling of 'll' in 'generall', or 'Allexander'). Almost no abbbrevations, and few superscript letters (but occasionally 'ye').
The manuscript is unfoliated and unpaginated.
No ruling or pricking. Occasional catchwords added in the hand of the main scribe.
The scribe has left good-sized margins, so no text has been lost. Nevertheless, little space is wasted in this manuscript. The size of the hand and the length of the lines is very uniform throughout, giving an organised appearance. Items or sections of text are frequently divided by blank spaces or dotted horizontal lines.
There is no illustration or decoration anywhere in the manuscript; however, the top, front, and bottom edges of the paper (see Additional images) have been marbled in red and blue pattern. The vogue for marbled edges was apparently shortlived, between the 1670s and 1690s. Indeed, as David Pearson suggests (English Bookbinding Styles, 1450-1800), 'bindings with edges like this can normally be dated within that twenty-year window' (p. 112). This helps us confirm a date for the manuscript in the third (or final) quarter of the seventeenth century.
A Belton House bookplate can be found inside the front cover. No other marks of ownership. It is very likely that the manuscript never left Belton House after the collection was compiled by 'Old' Sir John Brownlowe.